<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Windows Server HQ by Train Signal.com &#187; Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/tag/beta/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com</link>
	<description>We are here to help you learn Windows Server!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Certification Information Update</title>
		<link>http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-certification-680-685-686-mcitp</link>
		<comments>http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-certification-680-685-686-mcitp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Szpunar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCITP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Certifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/?p=6493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made a post way back in April when information about Windows 7 certifications had just started to trickle out. Back then, this is what was projected (Note* These exam titles are no longer quite accurate – see below):

70-680, TS: Windows 7, Configuring
70-685, MCITP: Windows 7, Enterprise Desktop Support Technician
70-686, MCITP: Windows 7, Desktop Administrator

Since then [...]

<h3>Related posts:<ul><li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-certification-is-vista-still-worth-it' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Windows 7 Exams are on the Way &#8211; Is a Vista Certification Still Worth it?'>Windows 7 Exams are on the Way &#8211; Is a Vista Certification Still Worth it?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/server-2008-active-directory-configuring-exam-70-640-certification' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Active Directory (Exam 70-640) Certification'>MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Active Directory (Exam 70-640) Certification</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/server-2008-network-infrastructure-exam-70-642' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Network Infrastructure (exam 70-642) Certification'>MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Network Infrastructure (exam 70-642) Certification</a></li>
</ul></h3>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a post way back in April when <a title="Windows 7 Exams are on the Way – Is a Vista Certification Still Worth it?" href="http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-certification-is-vista-still-worth-it" target="_blank">information about Windows 7 certifications</a> had just started to trickle out. Back then, this is what was projected (Note* These exam titles are no longer quite accurate – see below):</p>
<ul>
<li>70-680, TS: Windows 7, Configuring</li>
<li>70-685, MCITP: Windows 7, Enterprise Desktop Support Technician</li>
<li>70-686, MCITP: Windows 7, Desktop Administrator</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Since then there have been some interesting developments.</strong></p>
<p>First of all, the MCITP titles have a different word arrangement than the actual exam name. Is that less or more confusing? Actually, I think it is less. For example, what you see above lists the exam number 70-685 and the letters MCITP in the same line. This might lead you to believe that you would become an MCITP after taking just the 70-685 exam. That would be too easy!</p>
<p>Instead they have made the actual MCITP title:</p>
<p><em>     MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Support Technician 7</em></p>
<p>while the exam is being called:</p>
<p><em>     70-685, Pro: Windows 7, Enterprise Desktop Support Technician</em></p>
<p>Here is some more information about the two MCITP paths that will be available for Windows 7:</p>
<p><span id="more-6493"></span></p>
<h3>MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Support Technician 7</h3>
<p>Like other Microsoft Certified IT Pro level titles this one has several exam requirements that need to be fulfilled before you get the beloved MCITP letters after your name.</p>
<ul>
<li>70-680, TS: Windows 7, Configuring</li>
<li>70-685, Pro: Windows 7, Enterprise Desktop Support Technician</li>
<li>And an HDI (Help Desk Institute) customer service exam:<br />
&#8211; <a title="HDI Support Center Analyst" href="http://www.thinkhdi.com/certification/sca.aspx" target="_blank">HDI Support Center Analyst (HDI-SCA)</a><br />
or<br />
&#8211; <a title="HDI Desktop Support Technician" href="http://www.thinkhdi.com/certification/dst.aspx " target="_blank">HDI Desktop Support Technician (HDI-DST)</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Who is <a title="HDI" href="http://www.thinkhdi.com/" target="_blank">HDI</a>? They are the leading international association for technical support professionals. They offer training and certification in IT service and support.</p>
<p>The theory is a good one: a certification that shows you both understand the technical aspects and are actually human. But when push comes to shove, will an HR manager really know the difference between <em>Enterprise Desktop Support Technician</em> and <em>Enterprise Desktop Administrator</em>? Who knows.</p>
<h3>MCITP: Enterprise Desktop Administrator 7</h3>
<p>There is still nothing official said about this path yet. I would guess it would include the 70-680, 70-686, and maybe one other exam. I do know it will not include the “soft skills” requirement from HDI. Ken Rosen from <a title="Born to Learn Blog" href="http://borntolearn.mslearn.net/2009/07/important-clarification-about-windows-7-certifications" target="_blank">Born to Learn</a> says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So for those of you who want a well-rounded technology+soft skills credential, there’s MCITP: EDST7, and for those of you just want the Win7 piece, there’s MCITP: EDA7&#8243;</p></blockquote>
<h3>So what about MCTS: Windows 7, Configuration?</h3>
<p>Since my last Windows 7 certification post the 70-680: TS: Windows 7, Configuring exam has, thankfully, not changed names. It was removed from being in beta status last month. An <a title="70-680 Objective List" href="http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-680&amp;locale=en-us#tab2" target=_blank">objective list</a> is available but Microsoft has no study materials available yet (and neither do many legitimate 3rd parties).</p>
<p>Microsoft has promised that the 70-680 exam can be used toward the MCITP: Enterprise Administrator title, but I have been hearing that people are having issues with this. They have completed 70-680 and all the other requirements for Enterprise Admin, but are still not receiving the Enterprise Admin title on their transcripts. </p>
<p>I hope MS gets their act together and gets this resolved or people are going to be more reluctant to be early certification adopters in the future. What would Microsoft do without their beta exam takers?</p>
<p>So there you go. That is the latest confirmed and unconfirmed information about Windows 7 certifications. Don’t shoot the messenger!</p>


<h3>Related posts:<ul><li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-certification-is-vista-still-worth-it' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Windows 7 Exams are on the Way &#8211; Is a Vista Certification Still Worth it?'>Windows 7 Exams are on the Way &#8211; Is a Vista Certification Still Worth it?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/server-2008-active-directory-configuring-exam-70-640-certification' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Active Directory (Exam 70-640) Certification'>MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Active Directory (Exam 70-640) Certification</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/server-2008-network-infrastructure-exam-70-642' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Network Infrastructure (exam 70-642) Certification'>MCTS Demystified: What you need to know about the Server 2008 Network Infrastructure (exam 70-642) Certification</a></li>
</ul></h3>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-certification-680-685-686-mcitp/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performance Shootout: Microsoft’s XP, Vista, and Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/performance-shootout-microsoft%e2%80%99s-xp-vista-and-windows-7</link>
		<comments>http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/performance-shootout-microsoft%e2%80%99s-xp-vista-and-windows-7#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Szpunar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/?p=4612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Kingsley-Hughes at ZDNet did a performance test pitting the different Microsoft operating system against each other. He wanted to see how the different Windows 7 builds would compare to Vista and XP. This unofficial performance competition was done knowing that Microsoft’s latest OS is still in beta, but the author thought it would be [...]

<h3>Related posts:<ul><li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-downgrade-rights' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Downgradable Windows 7 &#8212; Downgrade Not Just to Vista, But XP Too'>Downgradable Windows 7 &#8212; Downgrade Not Just to Vista, But XP Too</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/why-vista-sucks-and-windows-7-does-not' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why I hate Vista and can’t wait to start using Windows 7'>Why I hate Vista and can’t wait to start using Windows 7</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/skipping-vista' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Skipping Vista &amp; Going Straight from XP to 7 is the Best Option &#8211; For Some of Us'>Why Skipping Vista &amp; Going Straight from XP to 7 is the Best Option &#8211; For Some of Us</a></li>
</ul></h3>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-4635 float" title="Microsoft OS Race" src="http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/race.jpg" alt="Microsoft OS Race" width="255" height="270" style="padding-top: 10px;"/>Adrian Kingsley-Hughes at ZDNet did a performance test pitting the different Microsoft operating system against each other. He wanted to see how the different Windows 7 builds would compare to Vista and XP. This unofficial performance competition was done knowing that Microsoft’s latest OS is still in beta, but the author thought it would be a good clue to how Windows 7 is progressing and maybe even how it will eventually fare against the older operating systems. Check out if Windows 7 can beat Vista and XP!</p>
<h2>Here are the main details of what was tested:</h2>
<p><strong>The experiment tested the following five operating systems:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Windows XP SP3 32-bit</li>
<li>Windows Vista SP1 32-bit</li>
<li>Windows 7 beta 1 build  7000 32-bit</li>
<li>Windows 7 beta 1 build  7000 64-bit</li>
<li>Windows 7 build 7048 64-bit</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>There are 31 real world scenario tests. Here are some examples: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Installing the operating system</li>
<li> Booting up and shutting down</li>
<li> Moving 100MB of JPEG files from one hard drive to another</li>
<li> Opening a complex Excel document including formula and charts</li>
<li> And even tests running video games like Call of Duty</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-4612"></span><strong>Each test was done on two separate desktop systems:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> An AMD Phenom 9700 2.4GHz system fitted with an ATI Radeon 3850 and 4GB of RAM</li>
<li> An Intel Pentium Dual Core E2200 2.2GHz fitted with an NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS and 1GB of RAM</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The result of each test is scored with a simple point system</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li> 1 point for the fastest OS</li>
<li> 2 points for second place</li>
<li> 3 points for third</li>
<li> 4 for forth</li>
<li> 5 points for last place</li>
</ul>
<h2>Are you brimming with anticipation to know what he found? Here are the results:</h2>
<ul>
<li>Windows 7 is, overall, better than both Vista and XP.</li>
<li>As Windows 7 progresses, it’s getting better (or at least the 64-bit editions are).</li>
<li>On a higher-spec system, 64-bit is best.</li>
<li>On a lower-spec system, 32-bit is best.</li>
</ul>
<p>I think it the analysis itself is super interesting and the results exciting! I can’t wait to see Adrian’s next version done with an actual Windows 7 release candidate.</p>
<p>You can see a full list of 31 tests, charts detailing the results of each test, and more about the experiment on <a title="Adrian Kingsley-Hughes's Blog post at ZDNet" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3789" target="_blank">Adrian Kingsley-Hughes&#8217;s blog</a>.</p>


<h3>Related posts:<ul><li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/windows-7-downgrade-rights' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Downgradable Windows 7 &#8212; Downgrade Not Just to Vista, But XP Too'>Downgradable Windows 7 &#8212; Downgrade Not Just to Vista, But XP Too</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/why-vista-sucks-and-windows-7-does-not' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why I hate Vista and can’t wait to start using Windows 7'>Why I hate Vista and can’t wait to start using Windows 7</a></li>
<li><a href='http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/skipping-vista' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Skipping Vista &amp; Going Straight from XP to 7 is the Best Option &#8211; For Some of Us'>Why Skipping Vista &amp; Going Straight from XP to 7 is the Best Option &#8211; For Some of Us</a></li>
</ul></h3>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://windowsserver.trainsignal.com/performance-shootout-microsoft%e2%80%99s-xp-vista-and-windows-7/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
